An example of RAW workflow in Photoshop CS3 |
|||||
|
|
|||||
This page may open somewhat slowly - there are a lot of illustrations, and some of them are fairly large of necessity. I chose one of the first shots taken with the Nikon D300, during a nighttime snowstorm, since it is a challenging image and thus involves much of Adobe Camera RAW's devices on the first (Basic) tab, I will narrate in the first person. |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
I selected the image in Adobe Bridge and double-clicked
upon it to open it.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
The first step will be colour balance. There is a
mix of light sources so an overall neutral colour balance can only be
obtained by balancing areas, then using layers and layer masks to blend
them. As this is a nighttime street scene, I want to retain some of
the feeling of street lights. To set the colour balance, I select the
colour balance tool - an eyedropper - from the upper left side of the
toolbar, at the top of the window.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Knowing that fresh snow is a true neutral, I click
various places in the image until the balance pleases my eye. The shadow
of the tree was just fine. If necessary, I can fine-tune later.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
I adjust the Fill Light slider to bring up details
in the dark trees. It opens up shadow detail, leaving mid-tones and
highlights intact. If overused, there will not be a smooth transition
between shadow and mid-tones and it can even generate a visible line
where the crossover takes place. A very useful tool.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
The Recovery slider will recover all the highlight
detail in the image, leaving pure white intact. In most images, one
will want some pure white and pure black to remain. If highlights are
less than a luminance of 255, the image will look dull, while if there
is no zero value in the shadows, the image will look muddy or weak.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
The Clarity slider increases local contrast without
impacting the overall contrast of the image, which is just fine. I zoomed
in on the streetlight to clearly see the falling snow and moved the
Clarity slider to the optimum point.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Vibrance increases local saturation will little impact
on overall saturation unless applied to excess. I added it until I got
the colour and sparkle I wanted.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
When shooting the photograph, I paid close attention
to the camera's histogram so neither the exposure nor the Brightness
slider were needed. The exposure slider moves the whole histogram toward
a darker or lighter image without changing the luminance relationships
within the exposure. Brightness increases the bias of tones toward darker
or lighter, leaving the maximum and minimum values untouched. Contrast
expands the dynamic range if necessary. They are both set at the default
settings. Together, all the sliders give the photographer great power
to shape the histogram to the needs of the image. When the settings
are to taste, click on Open Image.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Viewing the image and its histogram in Photoshop,
I felt that it needed more solid black as a visual reference, so used
Levels to set the point below which everything will have a luminance
of zero.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Setting the black point lower lost some of the shadow
detail I wished to retain, so once again Level were used to move the
mid-tones up the luminance scale a bit. There was no need to adjust
the highlights, since actual light sources were in the picture, providing
a pure white highlight as reference for the viewer's eye. At this point,
I was quite satisfied with both dynamic range, saturation and colour
balance and did not feel the need to meddle more.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Pretty much every digital image whether scan or digital
camera exposure needs some sharpening. Photoshop provides a wide variety
of options. In this case I wanted rather subtle sharpening, but sufficient
that when the image is reduced to web-resolution little or none will
be required. Step one is to duplicate the background layer.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
With the new layer selected, from the Filter menu,
select Other and then High Pass.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
In the dialogue, I inserted a low radius, but one
with sufficient strength to accomplish the level of sharpening I wanted.
This is learned by trial and error, play with the technique until you
get a feel for what is needed.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Since I was using a low radius, but wanted a strong
effect, I chose Hard Light as the blending mode from the dropdown menu
in the Layers palette. A slightly less strong application can be used
by choosing Overlay and an even more subtle impact by choosing Soft
Light. One can fine tune further by using the proportional Opacity or
Fill sliders. With the variable radius plus the blending options, High-Pass
sharpening is vastly controllable.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Satisfied with the sharpening and with the new layer
still selected, I chose to flatten the image to a single layer.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Image correction now complete, it is time to resize
it for this web-page.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
In the past, a width of 640 was pretty much standard
for photography on the web. With more people having high-speed connections
and running higher resolution monitors, 800 pixels is now acceptable.
Choosing Bicubic Sharper, one can reduce the image with minimum damage
from interpolation.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Photoshop's Save or Web and Devices gives one great
control over size and quality of images.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Since there is no type in the final image, JPEG is
chosen rather than PNG for the output. In order to produce an image
that will open readily, click on the little triangle in the circle,
indicated by the arrow. Choose Optimize to File Size.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Choosing a file size of 96K in an image this size
avoids obvious JPEG artifacts, but still produces an image small enough
for quick opening in e-mail or on the web
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
The image is saved in the appropriate folder, for
use in this tutorial.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
The finished image seen on the web..
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
It was suggested that the preview image as seen above
be shown for comparison. Since RAW has no inherent colour balance, the
preview image simply represents how the camera was set at the time of
the exposure - Auto White Balance, in this case. As the colour temperature
of the light-source drops, less and less correction is applied by the
camera, and so photographs taken under incandescent or toxic-orange
streetlights display as abnormally warm. There is good reason for this.
Such spectra are also common in most sunsets. A few early digital cameras
were set so that 2500K incandescent bulbs were seen as neutral white
- so were sunsets! The effect was of a sunset without colour. Nikon
wisely allows one to set colour temperatures or do preset colour balancing
if JPEGs are the goal, or colour balance after the fact when shooting
RAW. Of course one can also use such settings for RAW, and they will
be reflected in the preview image. However, they are meaningless for
the final processed version.
|
|||||
|
|||||